After decades of effort, the voluntary, collaborative approach to restoring the health and vitality of the Chesapeake Bay— the largest estuary in the United States—has not worked and, in fact, is failing.
A diverse group of 57 senior scientists and policymakers have joined forces to save the Bay. This is our plan.
(For help understanding some technical terms, see our Acronym Glossary.)
An Action Primer
The sorry state of the Chesapeake Bay did not happen overnight and it will take many years to correct its problems. Without these 25 steps, listed below in six categories of pollution concerns, the Bay is doomed.
Significantly Reduce Farm Runoff
1. Discrete, performance-based targets for nutrient and sediment reductions from all nonpoint sources to improve water quality, including all Best Management Plans (BMP), should be required and assessments of those BMPs and reduction targets should be conducted by independent third-party entities.
2. Each state should adopt requirements to implement measures, including BMPs, throughout each waterway designated by the EPA for the entire Bay watershed. These are necessary to achieve the nutrient and sediment TMDLs by a date certain to meet “reasonable assurance” expectations. Detailed sanctions, including penalties, should be included for any source that fails to meet the TMDL or two-year milestones.
3. Reducing nonpoint source loads from agricultural operations, including any necessary new regulations and better enforcement, should be part of each state’s WIP and should be fully implemented. These must include readily enforceable mechanisms and independent monitoring.
4. States should significantly expand the CAFO designation to cover all but the smallest AFOs. All agricultural lands receiving manures from any AFO should be treated as a regulated entity/activity. It is equally important that assessment and accountability of all CAFOs and all other federal and state regulated agricultural activities be increased.
5. States should adopt requirements in their WIPs for all land disposal of animal waste/manure that parallel Maryland’s regulations under the Maryland Department of Environment for the land disposal of human sludge from advanced wastewater treatment facilities.
6. States’ WIPs should require that on any agricultural lands that receive human sludge and/or animal waste/manure, cover crops should be mandatory for a minimum of one year after application. Even with the use of cover crops, sludge and animal waste/manure should be required to be injected or incorporated into soils within 24 hours of application. Further, the practice of human sludge or animal waste/manure application to fields with excessive phosphorus levels must be stopped.
7. Greater accountability and verification of performance of agricultural BMPs is essential and must be required [in all WIPs ].
8. State’s [WIPs ] should mandate whole-farm water quality plans for all agricultural lands, including the next generation of nutrient management, with clear targets, a reasonable implementation schedule, progress checks and enforcement.
Control Development
9. While reducing agricultural nutrients and sediment loadings may be the immediate challenge as farm pollutants are the greatest source of loadings and the most cost-effective to reduce, offsetting the effects of population growth and development by 100 percent is essential to maintaining any progress made by other sectors. States should adopt measures to expand MS4 jurisdiction over more developed lands, better septic system requirements, and improved growth control measures as these are essential.
10. A requirement is critically needed for no net increases in storm water discharge rate, volume and pollutants for all new development for a five-year storm.
11. States should adopt improved water quality retrofit requirements for MS4 permits and for all developed lands including road construction or reconstruction, and all such MS4 permits should be required to meet the no net increase in rate, volume, and pollutants rule. For re-development, to the maximum extent practicable, no net increase in rate, volume, or pollutants should be required for a five-year storm and offsets required where this no-net increase requirement cannot be met.
12. States should adopt provisions for improved water quality through systematic urban retrofits of large areas of developed lands such as shopping centers, large industrial sites and other large impervious surfaced areas in private ownership, with mandatory measures and timelines for such retrofits.
13. Measures to reduce or eliminate fertilizer usage on residential lawns, golf courses and public lands should be adopted and included in WIPs, including measures to prohibit phosphorus in fertilizers sold for maintenance of such properties.
14. States should ensure that all federal and state facilities and public lands in the watershed undertake storm water retrofits to meet TMDL allocations and two-year milestones. The federal and state facilities and lands should follow guidance developed by EPA pursuant to Section 438 of the Energy Independence and Security Act and Section 502 of Chesapeake Bay Executive Order (13508).
Protect Forests / Plant Trees
15. States should require a no net loss of forest coverage in each Bay watershed of the 92 waterway segments to achieve the nutrient and sediment TMDLs by a date certain to meet “reasonable assurance” expectations. States should include in their WIPs and implement detailed measures to expand forested buffer coverage to at least 85 percent of all the shores of the Bay and its tributaries.
16. States should target funds for the fee simple or easement purchase of sensitive lands such as forests and wetlands on private lands and farm lands, especially those bordering the Bay and its rivers. Acquisitions should take into consideration State Wildlife Action Plans and Green Infrastructure maps that have been updated to reflect the implications of climate change and expected sea level rise.
Upgrade Septic Systems
17. WIPs must include and states should adopt provisions that require all new and replacement OSWDS in the Chesapeake Bay watershed to be systems that utilize the BAT for nitrogen removal.
18. States should adopt requirements for implementation of a mandatory septic inspection program for existing systems, with a requirement for a BAT system for nitrogen removal in failing systems.
19. WIPs should contain and states should adopt requirements to evaluate existing clusters of septic systems for connection to centralized sewage treatment that uses Enhanced Nutrient Removal (ENR).
Clean Air
20. WIPs should contain provisions for better control of air emissions by better regulating and enforcing emission controls from all sources.
21. All new stationary sources of air emissions that contribute increased nitrogen to the Bay should be offset and WIPs must include provisions for accomplishing this offset.
Improve WWTPs
22. All WWTPs should be required to meet nutrient discharge limits of no more than 3.0 mg/l Nitrogen and 0.3 mg/l Phosphorus in the WIP.
23. States should allocate WWTP pollution loads based on 2010 wastewater flows, assuming a concentration of 3.0 mg/l of nitrogen and 0.3 mg/l of phosphorus. Any increased nitrogen or phosphorus loads with flows beyond 2010 actual flow levels must be offset with equal or greater reductions from other sources.
24. States must aggressively address and fund infrastructure upgrades to prevent and treat combined sewer overflows.
25. States should adopt measures to assure that existing Clean Water Act and other water quality laws are fully enforced, including at all WWTPs .
I embrace your no-nonsense 25 action step action plan. I have been working on Bay education and restoration for 24 years and I am as frustrated at the lack of progress, bureaucracy, posturing, mountains of studies, etc, as your group. Keep pushing the agenda. There is a strong force behind you!
There are a few obvious omissions that I suggest you consider:
1. Significantly incentivize sustainable agriculture. This can take many forms. Sustainable ag experts can break this down to the many options. One such option would be to convert (through $ incentives) CAFO’s into farms with grass raised animals (beef, dairy, poultry, pork). The net result is to reduce corn acreage (a highly polluting annual crop) to a perennial cover based system of grass pasture and hay. No land is taken out of production, farm profits can increase, nps runoff is dramatically reduced on a local farm scale. Highlight the health benefits of pasture raised animals. Work with the large chicken corporations to come with alternative, less polluting food crops for chickens.
2. Streams. The amount of nps sediment from entrenched stream channels is significant. Develop low cost, low tech measures to address this significant sediment source. This is a major source of sediment that is not talked about enough.
3. Oysters. A significant investment in oyster restoration is needed
4. Education. The people need more and sustained education about the Bay. A critical mass of people will ultimately hold government accountable.
Thank you for not blaming the watermen.
Robin
[…] From the website is the following including a 25 Step Action Plan. […]
[…] an activist for saving the Chesapeake Bay. He teamed up with numerous Bay advocates to develop a 25-step plan to save the bay that are on our […]
I just came across this information as a result of working with Annapolis Green toward improving recycling efforts at the US Sailboat Show coming up.
I don’t see anything in the list of 25 that relates to watercraft getting greener and cleaner. Electric Yacht has designed a line of electric propulsion systems for sailboats to around 40 feet, and they have implications for powerboats as well. An Electric Yacht QuieTorque System has no need for fossil fuels, oil changes, and has an average range of 20nm, and can achieve hull speed for a lesser distance.
Fin the interest of full disclosure– I am the Director of Marketing at Electric Yacht and hope visitors to our booth will be able to see the advantages. We are the largest domestic producer of such systems. Our booth is on the Floating Pavilion on Dock H under the banner of a like-minded consortium we titled “Yacht to be Green.”
Everyone needs to realize that Nitrogen and Phosphorus are Elements, they appear on the Periodic Table of Elements. Remember what that means from High School? They cannot be created or destroyed!
It is a huge mass-balance equation with imports and exports of N and P into and out of the watershed. We need to look at measures that creatively re-use the N and P that we already have in the system while exporting as much as we can out of the watershed and importing as little as possible.
Many of the measures proposed here and elsewhere do nothing but put the N and P somewhere else in the watershed. It is indeed true that when incorporated into woody plant tissue it will be sequestered for some time and less time in the leaves. Infiltrating it into groundwater only delays it’s introduction into the Bay.
A market based approach that takes all of the money that we currently waste and that which will be wasted on inefficient and expensive practices should be made available top proposers of projects that remove the most N and P or tie up the most for long periods of time for the least amount of money. Let’s encourage innovation and an approach that might actually work without bankrupting us all.
Hmm it seems like your site ate my first comment (it was super long) so I guess I’ll just sum it up what I submitted and say, I’m thoroughly enjoying your blog. I too am an aspiring blog blogger but I’m still new to everything. Do you have any helpful hints for first-time blog writers? I’d genuinely appreciate it.
Dead indited written content, thanks for information .