Chesapeake Bay Action Plan

After decades of effort, the voluntary, collaborative approach to restoring the health and vitality of the Chesapeake Bay— the largest estuary in the United States—has not worked and, in fact, is failing.

A diverse group of 57 senior scientists and policymakers have joined forces to save the Bay.  This is our plan.

Chesapeake Bay’s Future at Stake

By Senator Gerald Winegrad | January 6, 2011

Posted by Gerald Winegrad.

The recently filed plans by states on how they will meet the pollution diet mandated under the Clean Water Act fall well short of the necessary measures to restore the Bay. Missing are details about how they will fund the platitudes in the plans as well as specific regulatory measures that will be taken to reduce farm pollution and developed land pollution.

We Have a Plan, Now We Need Leadership

By Erik Michelsen | January 4, 2011

Posted by Erik Michelsen.

Late last year, when Maryland turned in its roadmap for cleaning up the Chesapeake to the federal government, many of us held out considerable hope that it would not only detail strategies for how we, collectively, are going to clean up our portion of the Bay’s pollutants, but also clearly articulate the ways that the state would finance this multi-billion dollar initiative.

Our New Year’s resolution: Looking after our own backyards

By Bill Dennison | January 1, 2011

Posted by Bill Dennison.

The recently released Chesapeake Bay Foundation report provided a Bay-wide assessment of the status of Chesapeake Bay as a whole. While this high altitude view of Chesapeake Bay gauged against the John Smith Chesapeake Bay of the early 1600s is useful as a benchmark, it does not readily translate into local action. This is because of the immense scale of Chesapeake Bay, especially considering the scale of the Chesapeake watershed.

Our Natural Heritage Sqaundered

By Senator Gerald Winegrad | December 30, 2010

Posted by Gerald Winegrad.

As we celebrate the Christmas season and anticipate the coming New Year with family and friends, my thoughts have turned inward. Now in my mid-60’s, I think deep thoughts of the way things used to be and how radically things have changed. Sadly, as I reflect on the Chesapeake Bay and its mighty rivers and its many streams, I see the results of the slow but ongoing degradation and poisoning of this natural legacy.

United We Stand?

By Fred Tutman | December 29, 2010

Posted by Fred Tutman.

In our Bay preservation movement there some among us are deeply committed to compatible ideals and to the environment but lack the momentum or body politic to communicate their views clearly or beyond the narrow subset of environmentalism they represent. We are often divided within—as much by interest group as by our vision of what winning actually looks like. Such of our subsets are just not mainstream enough by orientation to communicate comfortably with those outside their own choir, but we include them by reference in order to swell our ranks. Truthfully, these are folks who have a smaller (but important) vision not always shared by all.

Environmental Coalitions That Get Results

By Fred Tutman | December 22, 2010

As environmentalists who care about our planet and our society we operate in an increasingly slippery environment in terms of gaining traction for our vision for clean water and strong communities. In tough economic times we are often seen not as champions of the public interest, but as adversaries of the economic system. I think we need a makeover of our tactics if we hope to make a real difference.

Why We Lose (Part IV)

By Howard Ernst | December 21, 2010

(Posted by Howard Ernst.)

The Chesapeake Bay Commission describes itself as a tri-state legislative commission created in 1980 “to advise the members of the General Assemblies of Maryland, Virginia, and Pennsylvania on matters of Bay-wide concern.” Yet the majority of its elected members have poor environmental voting records…

Why is Chesapeake Bay so vulnerable (and productive)?

By Bill Dennison | December 18, 2010

(Posted by Bill Dennison.) Chesapeake Bay is particularly vulnerable to human impacts and incredibly productive for three basic reasons.  1) The first of these reasons is that Chesapeake Bay is an estuary, a place where fresh and salt water mix.  2) The second of these reasons is due to the geographic setting; geomorphology and hydrography…

We are senior Chesapeake Bay scientists and policymakers from Maryland, Virginia and Pennsylvania who have concluded that after decades of effort, the voluntary, collaborative approach to restoring the health and vitality of the largest estuary in the United States has not worked and, in fact, is failing. Our group unanimously recommends that all states draining into the Chesapeake Bay adopt our 25 action items in their Watershed Implementation Plans (WIP) and implement them to improve the Bay’s water quality and to meet the requirements of the Clean Water Act.

Sign up for news & updates from Patuxent Riverkeeper